Talk:Ardisia crenata

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is food and drink. It's not a confirmed edible fruit. Chsbbs (talk) 01:28, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not a food or drink. I've spent hundreds of hours over the last three years pulling or spraying herbicide on this plant. As a retiree from the University of Florida, I've also spoken with UF agronomists who researched the plant. This plant is listed on the Category 1 List of Invasive Weeds (the worst category) for Florida, it is one of top ten weeds found in state parks and was recently declared a "noxious weed," which has legal ramifications. The UF publication used in footnote #9, lists three different instances of cattle death. In each case, due to dried up pastures from drought, farmers let cattle into their woodlots, were the weed grows. In at least two cases, 17-18 cattle died in each, their bodies were taken to the UF Vet School morgue. Large amounts of leaves and berries of this plant were found in the stomachs. While not positively determined as the cause of death, scientists felt sure this was the case. However, as the cause was not positive, UF scientists still listed it as "potentially poisonous to livestock, pets and people." This plant is an ecological disaster and I often refer to it as "the Burmese python of north central Florida." Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 01:59, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ardisia crenata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]