Talk:Balance theory

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I can't see why this material is inappropriate. Is the object to the content, writing style or visual formatting? Or something else? JohnWilliams (talk)

The issue raised is with respect to "general" notability, i.e. that the topic does not seem relevant to a wide, general audience. I don't agree with this view, but I'm a student of Psychology and may be unable to look at it from a generalist perspective. In either case, the article can do with less technical language, or at least can provide some context in plain English before delving into the jargon. I've tried to do so a bit in the opening paragraph via Wikilinks to wider topics and an explanatory statement. Can do with some more. VishalB (talk) 13:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Other Options[edit]

I can easily think of how a person may be mostly "good" or mostly "bad" yet still do a few things that would contradict that since things aren't black and white. I'd probably think "this thing is awesome. He made that? Well at least he did something right." Enough such examples I may decide I like him but if there are things really bad that make me not like him then I may like the object but not the person and feel no problems at all over that.75.129.91.157 (talk) 17:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of "<" and ">" not explained[edit]

What do Greater_than (>) and Less_than (<) mean in this context? I figured it out, I'm not stupid, but it SHOULD be clearly explained... 2600:1700:4CA1:3C80:8909:A33:E0EF:BB27 (talk) 18:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brain network[edit]

The following was removed:

Global hubness and descending degree distribution of positive and negative subnetworks push the signed network toward more balance states, reported in a brain network study.<ref name="saberi" {{cite journal | vauthors = Saberi M, Khosrowabadi R, Khatibi A, Misic B, Jafari G | title = Topological impact of negative links on the stability of resting-state brain network | journal = Scientific Reports | date = January 2021 | doi = 10.1038/s41598-021-81767-7 | url = https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-81767-7}} /ref>

The topology of positive and negative subnetworks affects the balance of signed network.

This article is about an analysis of social networks and has not been related to brain networks. Terms like "Global hubness" and "descending degree distribution" are undefined so this contribution is meaningless, even if supported by a journal article. Rgdboer (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chemistry valence and thiry[edit]

Valence and theriy 47.15.39.95 (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]