Talk:Bent function

$~+~$ and $~\oplus ~$

It's a bit strange that in this article the + sign (at least sometimes) stands for the exclusive or, although it usually represents the logical disjunction.

The article states that "$x_{1}x_{2}~+~x_{3}x_{4}$" is a bent function,
but only $x_{1}x_{2}~\oplus ~x_{3}x_{4}$ is one,
while $x_{1}x_{2}~\lor ~x_{3}x_{4}$ is not.

Maybe the $~+~$ signs should be replaced by $~\oplus ~$? Mate2code (talk) 18:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Boolean functions written in algebraic normal form use + for XOR, since it corresponds to addition over Z/2Z. Ntsimp (talk) 18:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

As long as the other convention is not used in this article, thats no problem. I've added the hint, that + stands for XOR, so no one should be confused. Mate2code (talk) 19:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Errr..

The article is written for mathematicians, not a general audience. Would someone please provide an explanation, in the introduction, that explains the subject in a manner comprehensible to a non-mathematician? Currently, many articles that refer to crytography (I got here from the Blowfish page) are written in a form that depends on technical terms that refer to pages which are more not less technical rendering, in this case, everything from the Blowfish article onward inaccessible to a lay readership. LookingGlass (talk) 08:48, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

I created this article myself, and I tried really hard to put a simple explanation in the lead. A bent function is a special kind of Boolean function. The name comes from the fact that it's maximally different from all the linear and affine functions. They're useful mostly in cryptography. But this is a technical subject, and the real details of how they're defined and what they're used for are going to be technical. I'd like to improve the article; what sort of explanation would be helpful? Ntsimp (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

I've added a little bit to the explanation in the lead. Does that help? Ntsimp (talk) 18:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Diagrams of Bent Functions

Hi,

could you please explain the diagrams in the top-right corner of the article? Specifically, how to interpret the diagrams, and where the nonlinearity calculations come from.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.58.164.102 (talk) 20:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Those were done by User:Mate2code. Frankly, I don't understand them myself. Ntsimp (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Well, at least the 4-ary diagrams have a longer description, coming from c:Template:Nonlinearity of 4-ary Boolean functions. I will make a Wikiversity page where I explain these graphics in more detail, and link to it on the description pages. In short: The nonlinearity of a Boolean function is how much it differs from a linear function, so these diagrams show all 2*2^n linear functions (as a binary Walsh matrix and its complement), and how much the function on top differs from all of them. 01100110 is a linear function, so in the diagram you can see that the nonlinearity is 0. 00000110 is not linear - the diagram shows that the nonlinearity is 2.
The calculations (that 2-ary functions are bent when they have NL=2, and that 4-ary functions are bent when they have NL=6) are not explained in the diagrams. The article explains them, and I have no idea if they could be illustrated. The diagrams merely illustrate that the NL is 1 or 6 respectively - not that or why this makes the functions bent. mate2code 15:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bent function. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722055600/http://www.costasarrays.org/costasrefs/b2hd-olsen82bent-function.html to http://www.costasarrays.org/costasrefs/b2hd-olsen82bent-function.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081026081723/http://jya.com/cast.html to http://jya.com/cast.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)