Talk:Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore Railway

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article lacks references.

Devon C‑class Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore Railway RDT.

References[edit]

I am somewhat surprised that more references are needed here - have a closer look or be more specific and I will do the necessary. Rosser1954

I think it may be the form of the references (which are non-standard for WP) rather than the refs themselves.

Check out the appropriate WP help page for more...

EdJogg 15:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see several issues with the referencing.

The short notes mostly have surname only - per WP:CITESHORT they should also have page numbers, and preferably the relevant publication year as well.

Some of the "Sources" are shown as "oral communication" - this fails WP:V and may also fail WP:NOR.

We have two lists of books - one headed "Sources", the other "Bibliography". Should the "Bibliography" section really be "Further reading", see MOS:APPENDIX? --Redrose64 (talk) 13:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore Railway/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

While there are several references listed at the end of the article, the article needs inline citations in order to move up to GA quality. Slambo (Speak) 18:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 09:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)