Talk:Boeing 737 Classic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Aviation / Aircraft (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
Note icon
This article has been selected for use on the Aviation Portal.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Number produced[edit]

From Boeing's Orders and Deliveries page, I get the following for each 737 variant. Original (-100: 30, -200: 991, -200C: 104) totals 1125. The Classics (-300: 1113, -400: 486, -500: 389) totals 1988. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

May Need To Be Updated[edit]

Near the end of the first section, it says " of January 1, 2001..." and then something about sales. Even if the amount of sales or whatever hasn't changed, the date and sales should be updated.Cedargang (talk) 23:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, it doesn't really matter because the 737 Classics were taken out of production in 2000. There's no real point in updating this, then. —Compdude123 (talk) 18:55, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Seat Pitch and Width[edit]

Why does the Specifications section include information on seat pitch and width? Don't these seat specifications vary with (and sometimes within) each operator (not to mention within each plane, if it has more than one class)? (talk) 03:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Good point. This doesn't quite make sense why this is here. Maybe it's just the standard, but you'd think this would vary by airline. —Compdude123 (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

This article needs expansion[edit]

I've noticed that this article needs to be expanded, mainly with more info added to the intro and development sections. This article in general is way shorter than the Boeing 737 and Boeing 737 Next Generation articles. The development and design section is really short, and has little information about the aircraft's development history and design features. I'd like to start working to change this; if anyone wants to help me that would be great. Thanks, Compdude123 (talk) 19:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)