Cardiff North (geographical area) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 September 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Cardiff. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Cardiff received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cardiff, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cardiff-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CardiffWikipedia:WikiProject CardiffTemplate:WikiProject CardiffCardiff articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
If possible mention a little background on the city's town twinning, if there's anything interesting to say.
"Natives of Cardiff" should be a category, but many of the more notable ones could be mentioned elsewhere in the article, e.g. historical figures in history and cultural figures in culture.
It is unclear how the area used for this estimates related to areas used in Welsh and UK government figures, which are presumably based on census areas. We should wait for the results of the 2021 census, which will presumably be released in the next few months. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll accept a gallery is preferred over a montage single image per WP:MONTAGE. In terms of Brains and Clark's Pies, I don't think I've seen food and drink in an infobox before (happy to be proven otherwise, but minimally food in city infoboxes are rare). Brains and Clark's Pies aren't even mentioned in the article (Brains is merely listed among companies), so inclusion of the images does not relate to the article and a source would be needed for their notability to the city overall.
In terms of the other images I'd prefer these images instead those chosen. Although I'll accept this is my personal preference.
Alternate Principality (Millennium) Stadium images, I'd prefer (1-5 left to right):
Alternate Skyline images, I'd prefer, the one proposed is really blurry.
Would prefer the stadium picture is moved around and a cityscape image is placed first, as the stadium is most likely going to be the image used in the page preview on desktop (It was when it was first changed, which I why I quickly noticed the images were changed), although this is a personal preference. Would prefer like New York City, Paris and Berlin a larger skyline type image is first. The stadium is the national Wales stadium and are a significantly defining part of Cardiff, so I'll understand if it remains first but I believe Cardiff is much more than the stadium and would prefer a cityscape image first.
Not sure about Spiller's records, it is mentioned in the article as the oldest record shop so relevant to the article, so would tolerate its inclusion, although for the infobox image not sure it is that important, I would prefer many of Cardiff's shopping arcades instead as the article states Cardiff is the "City of Arcades" although there is a separate article on that for such images.
I would have thought Cardiff Docks is a major factor in the history and success of Cardiff, if anyone was summarising the city. Far more so than Brains Beers or Clark's Pies. Just saying :) Sionk (talk) 11:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a fan of large collages, so I'd like to propose the following:
A skyline image
The castle
The bay, showing the Senedd and Millennium centre
The stadium
A skyline image is typical for city articles, and the other three are major landmarks and also show that Cardiff is the home of the Welsh government. Keep it simple. A.D.Hope (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@A.D.Hope, I don't mind large-ish collages, which are more common on city articles. (WP:UKCITIES max 6-8), and most of the most known cities have larger collages, so not sure why we have to limit Cardiff, but still open to four.
The selection seems good, although the docks had also been proposed. Great skyline image, although saddened with the Centre from its side in the bay, but a willing compromise. Would prefer the castle grounds over the keep, and prefer the pre-existing keep image, over proposed, although no biggie. But the colouring of the stadium and bay, seem off for me? The stadium is too dark, and prefer this lighter one, while the bay seems too artifically bright?
Plus it would need to be moved around to fit the page preview criteria, and I'm not sure if Cardiff can be summed up with a stadium as page preview. But this is just my opinion. Pinging those who participated prior, @Seth Whales @SionkDankJae20:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Large collages are tricky. I know the guideline says 6–8 images is fine, but personally I find that number tends to look crowded and indistinct unless great care is taken to accomodate the small image size.
Cardiff does seem to have an unusually low number of 'good' images available. The bay one, for instance, is definitely overexposed but is by far the best framed of the ones I could find. With the castle, the keep is probably the most recognisable part and also lends itself to a portrait image, which is handy in terms of composition. A.D.Hope (talk) 21:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The GDP values currently in the infobox are from 2012 and the archived source attached no longer plots/shows the values correctly. They are also being displayed as USD($) rather than GDP(£) which I would disagree with. – Mesidast (talk) 11:45, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article states "the city is fourth-largest in the United Kingdom". By the article linked in this sentence, Cardiff is the 10th largest with the top 4 slots being Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow and Sheffield. Am I missing something or is this just a mistake? ThomasRintoul (talk) 15:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Notable people section has all the problems characteristically associated with such sections - it's arbitrary, listy, and completely uncited. There was one, but it was spam. The Freedom of the city section does actually have a cite (so I removed the tag), but it was weirdly positioned at the bottom of the section. The bulleted list is basically a cut-and-paste of that source with blue links added. Quite a few of the early ones, Lord Mayors of Cardiff, don't actually have standalone articles. I'd be interested in others' thoughts as to the value/interest these sections bring to the article. For me, the first is difficult to justify, without criteria and without cites, and the major figures are/could be mentioned in other sections, History etc. As an example, Dame Shirley is currently mentioned in Music and performing arts, Notable people and Freedom of the city; and the second just isn't very interesting, such that I'd probably zap it. But others may feel very differently. KJP1 (talk) 11:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_s%C3%BCds%C3%BCdostw%C3%A4rts.jpg)
.jpg)
