Talk:Carol Shaya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment[edit]

There's enough information added in that I think it hits B-class. Still needs some fixing up to hit GA status. Wizardman 01:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Presumption in favor of privacy[edit]

Presumption in favor of privacy

Wikipedia articles that present material about living people can affect their subjects' lives. Wikipedia editors who deal with these articles have a responsibility to consider the legal and ethical implications of their actions when doing so. It is not Wikipedia's purpose to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. Biographies of living persons must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy.

When writing about a person notable only for one or two events, including every detail can lead to problems, even when the material is well-sourced. In the best case, it can lead to an unencyclopedic article. In the worst case, it can be a serious violation of our policies on neutrality. When in doubt, biographies should be pared back to a version that is completely sourced, neutral, and on-topic.

This is of particularly profound importance when dealing with individuals whose notability stems largely from their being victims of another's actions. Wikipedia editors must not act, intentionally or otherwise, in a way that amounts to participating in or prolonging the victimization.

Articles about people notable only for one event[edit]

Articles about people notable only for one event Policy shortcuts: WP:ONEEVENT WP:1E WP:BLP1E Main article: Wikipedia:Notability (people) Further information: WP:NOT#NEWS, WP:BIO1E, and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information See also: WP:WI1E and WP:WIALPI

Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be the subject of an encyclopedia entry. Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but essentially remains a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having an article on them.

If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a particular event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, low profile, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted. Biographies of people of marginal notability can give undue weight to the event, and may cause problems for our neutral point of view policy. In such cases, a merge of the information and a redirect of the person's name to the event article are usually the better options.

If the event is significant, and if the individual's role within it is substantial, a separate article for the person may be appropriate. Individuals notable for well-documented events, such as John Hinckley, Jr., fit into this category. The significance of an event or individual should be indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable secondary sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snuff ele uf a guss (talkcontribs) 14:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]