Talk:Château de Ramstein, Moselle

de or du

What follows is a copy of a discussion on User:Olivier's talk page:

You renamed Château de Ramstein as Château du Ramstein as that is how it is titled in French Wikipedia. Quite so. But one must not assume that French Wikipedia is correct. I created the page in English Wikipedia as a translation from the French in 2007, but had trouble with whether it was du or de. The problem is that most official and reliable sources use de, e.g.

• French Ministry of Culture database
• Regional Environment Department in its direcorty of Sites Inscrits et Classés
• Moselle-Tourisme [1]
• The local tourist office in listing castles Les châteaux forts du Pays de Bitche
  - and its tourist map
  - walking leaflet
  - as well as its whole page devoted to Ramstei in its description in French.
• The regional newspaper, Le Républicain Lorrain, "Baerenthal et son Ramstein" (21 july 2013)
• Guide Books, including page 305 in Petit Futé Metz
  - , page 44 in Alsace: Le Rhin Supérieur – La Route des Vins – Sundgau

On the other hand, some sites use du including

• The aforementioned tourist office(!), but only in its equivalent English page
• The town hall of Baerenthal on châteaux forts

On balance, it would seem to me that de is the more likely. What do you think? Emeraude (talk) 13:33, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your detailed message. I checked your sources and I agree with you that, while both "de" and "du" can be found, the "de" version seems to be more common. Also, Géoportail mentions "Ruines de Ramstein", which is quite a strong additional point in favour of "de", I believe. As a side note, as you most probably know, the French Ministry of Culture database is unfortunately not 100% reliable for names. Bottom line: I have moved the article back to Château de Ramstein and made the corresponding changes in the article. If you don't mind, I believe that it would be useful for future users to add your comments on the talk page of the article. To make things simpler, you could just copy this conversation if you wish. Thanks again. Cheers! Olivier (talk) 21:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Emeraude & Olivier -

Both châteaux are *de* Ramstein, one in Alsace, the other in Lorraine:

Château *de* Ramstein (Alsace), in Scherwiller, Bas-Rhin

http://www.jds.fr/scherwiller/chateau-alsace-ruines/chateau-de-ramstein-4939_L

http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10203684m

http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10212865z

Château *de* Ramstein (Lorraine), in Baerenthal, Moselle

http://patrimoine-de-france.com/moselle/baerenthal/chateau-fort-chateau-de-ramstein-3.php

http://www.moselle-tourisme.com/visiter/culture-et-histoire/ficheproduit/F853140325_le-chateau-de-ramstein-baerenthal.html

Title with *du* in fr.wiki article is wrong

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ch%C3%A2teau_du_Ramstein

Faced with several choices, among which are Ministère de la Culture, Sites inscrits & classés vs some touristy articles, I would opt for the first two.

Cordialement, --Blue Indigo (talk) 14:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Château de Ramstein (Moselle). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720205538/http://www.bitscherland.fr/Canton-de-Bitche/Baerenthal/ramstein.html to http://www.bitscherland.fr/Canton-de-Bitche/Baerenthal/ramstein.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 7 August 2017 (UTC)