Talk:Chamber of Commerce Building (Manhattan)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:56, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Basic stuff and comments

• "a NRHP" → "an NRHP" (acronym; both uses)
  • Done.
• Remove the comma after "included in the colonnade".
  • Done.
• "second bay from right" → "second bay from the right"
  • Done.
• Add a serial comma after "committee rooms" in #Interior.
  • Done.
• "moved out during 1979" → "moved out in 1979"
  • Done, though I did it slightly differently to avoid putting "out in" right next to each other. Epicgenius (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
• "U.S. president Grover Cleveland" → "U.S. President Grover Cleveland" (title)
  • Done.
• "became an entirely volunteer organization" → "became an entire volunteer organization" or "became a volunteer organization entirely"
  • I reworded it slightly differently. Epicgenius (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
• Mark sources from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Done, with subscription content marked accordingly. Epicgenius (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Thanks for the review. I have addressed all of the issues above. Epicgenius (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.