Talk:Chicago (1927 film)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Silent / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Page move[edit]

This page was moved from "Chicago (1927 movie)" to "Chicago (1927 film)" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) – Ianblair23 05:56, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Photo inappropriate?[edit]

1. The photo uploaded for this article is not a film poster for this original film. It clearly says on it that it's for a restored version, a "Two-DVD Deluxe Edition", presumably restored fairly recently.

2. What pressing need is there for boosting the image from the "Movieposterdb.com" site? The resolution is 300 x 418, exactly the same size as the image on Movieposterdb and at 45 KB, the file size is larger than their 28 KBs. WP suggests a "4:3 aspect ratio [. . .] allowing common cover art to be shown at 250 x 400 pixels". Particularly given the first point above, I don't see how using this image fulfills WP: Non-free content criteria #8: "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Thank you for your time, 00:51, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

- Corrected at some point, article now uses a 1927 lobby card for its image. Deanlaw (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]