Talk:Children in Need 2011

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British Start‑class

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Material added earlier under Children in need (lower case) 2011[edit]

The deletion / undeletion shambles can be seen here.[1] Content added to the other version has been lost due to admin. not restoring the version they deleted. Leaky Caldron 22:12, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected[edit]

I have just redirected Children in need 2011 to this page, as this one was here first. Hope that doesn't cause any problems with the editors of the other page, which was very similar in format and contact. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 22:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, about 12 history versions from this evening lost. Not to worry, I'm sure it will be re-edited. Leaky Caldron 22:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The history still exists on the redirect page, so it can be retrieved. I can see now that the redirect may cause an issue for a few editors, and for which I do apologise, but having two pages, one matching the established naming format, and another with the lower case "n" was confusing to say the least - and to many more people, especially as (as I have recently noticed) they were both being edited more or less in parallel by different (and even in some cases the same) editors. The longer the two exist in parallel, the more difficult it willbe to unravel in the end. Wikipedia isn't a news page, it is an encyclopedia, so if it takes a little time to bring the article up to the same standards as the previous editions of CiN, then I don't believe it will be too serious, and most people with a current interest in the show will actually be watching it right now. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]