Talk:Cyclone Anita

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Todo[edit]

Finish the meteorological history, and this sentence is unsourced:

However, the precursor to the cyclone caused more substantial damage. Torrential rainfall and severe weather damaged numerous homes in Rio Grande do Sul. Several tornadoes also touched down between March 5 and 7. Despite the damage, there were no reports of fatalities in relation to the cyclone

All in all, nicely done. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The MH should be finished ASAP, if possible. Juliancolton | Talk 14:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?[edit]

The storm isn't as rare as we thought they once were. Most of the article is just MH. My biggest qualm is that the title isn't really that well-known. A Google search doesn't indicate any reliable sources. There also aren't any post-storm sources mentioning the storm, unlike Catarina which still gets coverage. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, Antia is still one of a kind, of one only of three confirmed storms in the SATL. This storms passes WP:N and also affected land. IMO, it should stay. I am not supporter/opposing this merger, but if this ke article is kept, it will need tom be re-titled IMO. YE Tropical Cyclone 01:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]