Talk:Dnipro International Airport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DNK redirect[edit]

DNK TLA used by Denmark. It make sence to add it only after this article will be expanded. --TAG 12:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done - DNK. --TAG 02:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boeing737-UR-DNC.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Boeing737-UR-DNC.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now with Dniproavia being defunct...[edit]

...by whom the airport will be operated henceforth? --FoxyOrange (talk) 09:36, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is the proper title for this airport?[edit]

Page title says Dnipro International Airport, the article reads Dnepro International Airport and the official logo reads Dnepropretrovsk International Airport. So which one is it? Nearlyevil665 (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that all Ukranian sites have been tampered with by Russian propagandists on wikipedia, similarly to other Nation states in the region. In particular, the authors have assaulted the Ukranian language (claim it is Russian, 3 sites today) and continued to make criminally false claims regarding the status of the Nation of Ukraine itself. The authors are endangering the life and welfare of Ukranians today. Julie Ann Racino, Cornell and Syracuse University Alumni, 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7081:2000:3EF3:C15F:2C7D:27A4:3C1D (talk) 22:28, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Genuine Question[edit]

If the airport and it's facilities have been recently destroyed, should parts of the article be change into past tense? Or should this only happen if there is an established plan to retire the facility? 192.77.12.11 (talk) 05:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why - it it still an airport even if it has been damaged (destroyed - and we don't really know what destroyed actually means in this context). Do we think that it will not be rebuilt? We honestly do not know, going directly to "was" is going too far too soon. There is no hurry here, Wikipedia is an encycloaedia not a news service it does not need to reflect the absolute latest details. Andrewgprout (talk) 08:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it has been "completely destroyed" (as stated in the article confirmed with two references) then it should be changed to past tense. Otherwise, remove the sentence stating it was destroyed. Rhinogrin (talk) 14:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]