Talk:Dracula (1958 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Horror High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This page has slopy grammer and a slopy format to much to be fixed

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2021 and 20 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hdewey11.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Christopher Lee as Dracula.jpg[edit]

Image:Christopher Lee as Dracula.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite?[edit]

~~Considering the film's importance, this article isn't up to standard. If no one objects, I would like to have a go at re-writing it.Robertcornell68 (talk) 08:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

article is in bad shape[edit]

Considering the plethora of published material on Hammer in general and this movie in particular, the lack of sources and in-line citations is deplorable. Needs a major rewrite. Some sources that should be utilized: Photon article on Horror of Dracula, Hammer Films: An Exhaustive Filmography, A Heritage of Horror, various articles from Little Shoppe of Horrors, Hammer: The Bray Years, A History of Horrors: The Rise & Fall of the House of Hammer, The Hammer Story, The Vampire Cinema, The Charm of Evil-Terence Fisher, Christopher Lee & Peter Cushing & Horror Cinema: A Filmography, Do You Want It Good or Tuesday?, Inside Hammer, various issues of Dark Terrors, various issues of Video Watchdog, various issues of The House That Hammer Built, and so on, and so forth. HammerFilmFan (talk) 22:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dracula (1958 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Monetory unit[edit]

It is idiotic to have the budget in pounds sterling and box office in US dollars. Pick one or the other, please. What was a pound in dollars in 1958? Give me a break! 2601:246:80:3390:64C2:9A89:B85B:D9D9 (talk) 01:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]