Talk:Edward Eager

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyvio fixed[edit]

Copyvio fixed by simply removing the offending quote of the review, which had been there since 2006... hmm. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 08:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup designation removed[edit]

From July 2009 through February 2010, I added many citations and source materials, some of them secondary, some original so I removed cleanup designation. Luxmissus 14 February 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 22:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]

What exactly does this mean?[edit]

"Half Magic was the #1 seller in America."24.199.155.249 (talk) 17:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Three years later we have improved it cosmetically, from "#1" to "No. 1" semiautomatically and now, by my hand, to "number one". --P64 (talk) 17:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boucher's review[edit]

It will be valuable here(*) to read the 1954 FSF review for more information.

Presumably what we now quote does "compare the novel to Nesbit" as we say, meaning Eager to Nesbit and Half Magic to her children's fantasy novels. Better we should link at least one of them.

What if anything does Boucher say anything about "the british compliments" (sic), the main point of one anonymous revision (diff) that I just reverted in that respect.

What we now quote is appropriate to the body of this article, moreso than to the mini-section about the novel under review, and barely adequate to amplify what we say at Edith Nesbit about her legacy. Probably the review includes something specific to Half Magic and something more than adequate for use at Nesbit.

P.S. Boucher#Fiction writing and editing was the founding editor of FSF.
--P64 (talk) 17:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Edward Eager. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:21, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]