Talk:Equal Justice for United States Military Personnel legislation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Much of this article has been brought in "as is" from a BLP. Given the cut and paste nature of the edits, it is probably Below-Start-Class in quality. Duh -- it needs editing! Please help. --S. Rich (talk) 15:57, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, I should have some time over the weekend to start edits on this. (Mattwashdc (talk) 12:43, 3 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

govtrack resource template/sandbox[edit]

The following is a proposal for tracking the past and pending bills. It is subject to change (and deletion from talk once adopted for the article):

HR xxx Equal Justice for United States Military Personnel Act, 2009, 111th Congress [1] (pending)
HR xxxx Equal Justice for United States Military Personnel Act, 2008, 110th Congress [2] (did not pass)
HR xxx Equal Justice for United States Military Personnel Act, 2007, 110th Congress [3] (did not pass)
HR xxxx Equal Justice for United States Military Personnel Act, 2005, 109th Congress [4] (did not pass)
HR xxxx Equal Justice for United States Military Personnel Act, 2003, 108th Congress [5] (did not pass)

--S. Rich (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs updating for the 112th Congress[edit]

This article needs an update as it only contains information through the 111th Congress. Safiel (talk) 05:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect legislation has died. Accordingly, it now fails notability. The article was created as an effort to remove a vanity piece by a SPA and substitute something more encyclopedic. But once the BLP hero of the legislation was deleted (by his own request), the proponent of this article (Mattwashdc) discontinued editing. I suggest AFD.--S. Rich (talk) 05:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I should note that this legislation has been reintroduced in the 112th Congress, although so far no hearings have been held. The title is "Equal Justice for Our Military Act of 2011." The bill numbers are H.R. 3133 and S. 1664. The title of the article refers to the topic of equal justice rather than a specific bill in a specific Congress. There appears to have been plenty of media coverage meeting WP:GNG. An AfD would probably result in a keep. I will make a few edits to update this for the 112th Congress. Safiel (talk) 16:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]