Talk:Førde Airport, Øyrane

Førde Airport, Øyrane has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 12, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Aviation: Airports

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the airport project.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Førde Airport, Øyrane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 23:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Link "regional airport" rather than just "airport", as per WP:OVERLINK
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"municipal airport was first opened" remove "was"
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"established the airline Førdefly in 1966 as the second airline based in Sogn og Fjordane" copyediting needed, too many uses of word "airline"
- Fixed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Any external links
- Nope. Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great job overall. Once the above minor concerns are addressed, I will pass the article based on the good article criteria. Well done! TBr and ley 20:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review and sorry for the delay. I've been struck by a severe flu and had not the energy for such matters as Wikipedia until today. Arsenikk ^(talk) 15:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the article now. Well done! TBr and ley 00:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.