Talk:Forrest Sherman-class destroyer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomenclature[edit]

Were these named after the Civil War generals? --BDD 16:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. I haven't seen a source characterize what they were named after, but a look at Category:Forrest Sherman class destroyers indicates to me that they were named after prominent military figures dating from the Revolutionary War (USS Barry (DD-933)) through Korea (USS Turner Joy (DD-951)). Maralia 17:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met. --dashiellx (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mitscher-class reference removed[edit]

I removed the reference to the Mitscher-class being Forrest Sherman hulls because my research into the Shermans indicate it isn't true. According to "U.S. Destroyers: An Illustrated Design History", by Norman Friedman, the Mitscher and her sisters were a different class altogether. Friedman writes on page 246:

  • "When the CNO rejected DD-927 as the basis for mobilization planning (16 February 1951) he ordered the SCB to develop a NEW destroyer of 'reasonable' size. Within the fleet the sentiment was strong that the only good destroyer in existence was the Fletcher, so the SCB tried for a NEW FLETCHER. In April 1951, it issued preliminary characteristics for a NEW standard type, at the time designated SCB-85."

So according to Friedman, the Sherman-class began as an updated version of the Fletcher class design. Elsquared (talk) 04:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forrest Sherman-class destroyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]