Talk:Fujifilm X-mount

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

September 2013[edit]

The image is really weird. Where is the mount? Should have used at least a photograph with the rear cap taken off. Thyl Engelhardt 213.70.217.172 (talk) 07:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done I changed it to an image of the back of a Fujinon XF 18mm lens. Maybe there need to be added an image of the Fujifilm X-mount on a camera body? --Deraedemaekers (talk) 17:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Fujifilm X-series[edit]

This is essentially the same content: one contains the Fuji cameras and lenses, the other contains all those, plus third party X-mount products. Why not keep the more comprehensive of the two and eliminate the redundant one? Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:53, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed merge is for Fujifilm X-series to be merged into Fujifilm X-mount. I think if a merge is even beneficial then it would be better to merge into the article for the series of cameras, than into the article that is merely for those cameras' mount. I expect the best solution would be to retain both articles, and properly separate their content rather than repeat it; for Fujifilm X-mount to contain info about the mount, and for lenses available for that mount, certainly for non-Fujifilm lenses. -Lopifalko (talk) 19:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the X-series camera details from the X-mount article. I'm not sure which article I think the lists of lenses should be in - how has this been treated for articles about lens mounts? -Lopifalko (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have removed lenses section and linked back to the X-mount page which covers it in more detail Onlyslightlyconfused (talk) 15:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In summary: I note the consensus to move material rather than merge the pages, and this is now essentially complete (no action in more than a year).

Resolved

Klbrain (talk) 15:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Back focus distance[edit]

It might make sense to mention somewhere in the article that the x-mount has a minimum back focus distance of just 10.2 mm (which is really low, and allows for more compact cameras). https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x-pro1/3 70.49.131.182 (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fujifilm X-mount. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:12, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing information[edit]

There is no date given for the introduction of this mount, or what camera it first appeared in.

The dimensions of the mount are not described. Here is a link to a table to show some information commonly cataloged to describe lenses, that should be in the intro to this article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_mount — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroXero (talk • contribs) 21:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]