Talk:Guthram Gowt

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Lincolnshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering C‑class Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Drainage problem[edit]

There is a bit of a mystery about the use of the steam engines. The location mapped for the engines, and the location of the rubble, are on the North of the turnpike road. The river glen is to the South, and some 2.5 m higher than the road, or nearly 3.5m higher than the water in the drain.

If the engine was draining the fen into the Glen, then it is not clear how that could be done. The scoopwheel would have been too low, and the addit or gowt would have had to cross the road in mid-air.

I am left wondering if the engine was removing the seepage out of the banks of the glen into the parallel drains, and directing the water North into the 40 foot drain.

And yet, there is documentary evidence that the fen there was drained into the Glen, and by a succession of engines. I'm going to try and find out more.--Brunnian (talk) 21:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would be interesting to see the documentary evidence.

The answer appears to lie clearly in the Wheeler reference given in the article. The water was lifted into the South Forty Foot. Bourne North Fen is part of the Black Sluice Level and the commissioners responsible quite separately, for the Glen would not wish to sanction the dumping of water into their river. It has to be remembered that in conditions where farmers in the North Fen were keen to be rid of water, the Glen would already be full and in view of the dodgy nature of the north bank of the Glen, the North Fen farmers may have got their water back, together with that of the Glen.Stub

It was because of the danger of overloading the Glen that the weir was set in its north bank. This feeds excess Glen water into the Weir Dike which in turn, feeds into the South Forty Foot. There would be no point in pumping North Fen water right up to the Glen only for it to come back down to where it could have been put, at much smaller expense, in the first place. (RJPe (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I've tracked down the 'documentary evidence that was confusing me. K.S.G Hinde, in Fenland pumping Engines P184, describes the site and ends with the sentence Discharge is into the River Glen. The preceding sentence is about the current electrical pump, so it might only be referring to that, but I don't believe that the drainage authorities would suddenly start pumping water uphill and across the road into another authorities drain when the good old 40 foot is a few yards away. I've visited the site, and can see nothing either way. Brunnian (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an example of the weakness of wikipedia. The insistence on cross-references would make Hinde definitive, but on visiting the site it is clear that there is no electric pump. there is, rather, a rainfall monitoring station. Geograph locational photos of Guthram Gowt, including the modern rainfall station as photographed today. Local discussions show that there has been no pump here since 1971, and inspection of the water levels show that the fen is maintained around half a metere above the forty foot drain. Snag is a personal visit is 'original research' and so forbidden as a reference. Brunnian (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guthram Gowt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110428032212/http://www.blacksluiceidb.gov.uk/the-drainage-board/history.html to http://www.blacksluiceidb.gov.uk/the-drainage-board/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]