Talk:Hades Nebula

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Ganbare Goemon Kirakira Dōchū: Boku ga Dancer ni Natta Wake (6 participants)
Matt Alt (1 participant)
Granny (video game series) (2 participants)
Sago Sago (3 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (2 participants)
Unreleased third Minecraft album (7 participants)
Kelly Metzger (7 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (12 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled[edit]

Needs much NPOV work ("excellent" graphics and such might fit but only if supported by reviews and the like). Seraphimblade 07:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expert review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing review; sources have been found. --B. Wolterding 16:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As part of the Notability wikiproject, I am trying to sort out whether this topic is notable enough to have its own article. The problem with the article is that it is completely unsourced, and so currently seems to fail the notability criteria. Basically, what I would like to know is:

Do secondary sources (e.g. reviews in reliable publications) exist for this game, so that they can be added to the article; or
do such sources not exist (then the article should be deleted).

Your opinions are welcome; please add your comments below. --B. Wolterding 13:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a very disparaging review of it in the August 1987 Zzap!64 (link), which I eventually found in a very roundabout way. Nifboy 13:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There, article should be fixed up now. Nifboy 13:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also came out on spectrum see review, so added details. --Oscarthecat 15:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.