Jump to content

Talk:Health geography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can

[edit]

Can someone stop medical geography from redirecting to health geography because it's not the same thing at all. Thank you Supposed 20:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Health geography is used as a term that covers also the area of study of medical geography. It's Ok, that it redirects here. There's no need to write another article about medical geography, at least for now. You can better expand this article. GeoW 19:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're saying but medical geography is not health geography persay. Health geography came out of it but medical geography is all about the bio-medical model and logical positivism whereas health geography is grounded in structuration structuralism feminism etc as well as logical positivism Supposed 06:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone fancy defining access to healthcare as a seperate article. This is a huge area and would make a good article. I will try and add something once my semester is over but would be cool if someone were to start it in my absence. Supposed 16:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not clear on the difference between health and medical geography

I am doing a graduate seminar in human geography, and we are delineating the difference between health and medical geography. Health geography is post modern and not positivist (which lends itself to modernism). The original author for health geography is Robin Kearns whose article, "Place and Health: Towards a Reformed Medical Geography" (Professional Geographer, 1993) created a very different path for medical geography. Quoting Kearns "I suggest that two interrelated streams be identified within the medicine/health/geography nexus: medical geography and the geography of health. The concerns of the former are well known and involve spatial and ecological perspectives on disease and health care delivery. . . The concerns of the later would consider the dynamic relationship between health and place and the impacts of both health services and the health of populations groups on the vitality of places." So, medical geography is related to epidemiology and health geography is related to understanding the cultural framings and social identities related to health. Very different. Maybe one day I'll get around to doing something to change this page, or add one for medical geography. Bgoedecke (talk) 06:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bgoedecke, thanks for that. I say we should quote Kearns verbatim in the article, seeing as he effectively defined the field at its incarnation. Supposed (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

[edit]

Hi Dang. Thanks for placing the picture on the article. My concern is that the picture in question is not really descriptive of health geogrpahy enough to merit inclusion here. It's more suitible to an article say on epidemiology. Health geogrpahy may skirt, epidemiology demography etc which tend to be more focused on population measures. Health geography is really quite different, generally operating on a much more local scale and making use of qualitiative methods that are largely ignored by epidemiologists, demographers etcV ((think ethnography, semi-structured interviews etc) and hence ignored when that picture you have added was created. Supposed (talk) 13:30, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://health-geomatics.co.nr/
    Triggered by \bco\.nr\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cholera Outbreak/John Snow

[edit]

This is a nice tale that demonstrates John Snow's brilliance... and it serves as a great introduction to GIS and health geography in general. However, the story is a little misleading on this page. The cholera outbreak already was in steady decline by the time the pump was closed, Snow himself noted that. It didn't stop because the Broad Street pump was closed. Moreover, he didn't have power to order the closure of the pump. He merely presented his case and asked for authorities to close it down, which they did the following day after considering his description. This, combined with the fact that many people had fled the area by that time, was helpful in reducing the number of new cases. That said, they also reopened the pump a bit later, dismissing his theory entirely.

Obviously, I think this story belongs here, but maybe somebody with a better understanding of the history should rewrite it? It is a big deal in epidemiology and health geography, so it deserves a more careful explanation so that readers are not given the sort of mythical account of what happened.

Rob Shepard (talk) 18:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Underrepresentation and out of date

[edit]

This article talks a lot about the environmental thinking that John Snow had which led him to the problem, yet I can't help but feel this article completely leaves out the problem of proper healthcare or lack of it in geographic areas. In many countries we can see the difference in life expectancy and medical care as we examine minority areas vs. affluent areas. Secondly this page seems slow with the pace the rest of the field and the world on viewing this topic. Christopherfree6 (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Health geography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested merge from medical geography

[edit]

Health geography is the (co-)name of the subfield that was called medical geography a few decades ago. This development indicated the subfield's broadened interest in social theory, see, for instance, Place and Health: Towards a Reformed Medical Geography and Medical or health geography? Populations, peoples and places. Both terms are often used in combination, see the American Association of Geographers' Health and Medical Geography Specialty Group and the Blackwell Companion to Health and Medical Geography. So I agree that the two articles should be merged. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a clear distinction between Medical Geography and Health Geography. The Oxford Bibliography of Medical Geography defines Medical Geography as a 'sister field of health geography, which focuses on social dimensions of health, especially in economically advanced countries.' The two pages should remain distinct. UFGeog (talk) 21:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First, your source isn't the "Oxford Bibliography of Medical Geography", it's just Oxford Bibliographies Online's entry on Medical Geography. Second, there are entries on Geography and Health, the Geography of Health Care and the Geography of Disease as well. I don't quite understand why they choose this structure, but I think that for a general encyclopedia, it would be too much of a fragmentation if we adopt it. Plus, the entry on "Geography and Health" (written by Sarah Curtis) contradicts your statement, noting that health geography "evolved over time" from the "dominant focus on 'medical geography' [...] to be viewed as 'health geography,' considering health and illness as socially as well as medically constructed phenomena." Ironically, one of the authors of the article you cite, Michael Emch, is a self-declared health geographer. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, the statement you cite originally refers to a distinction made in the Companion to Health and Medical Geography, specifically Part I: Debates in Health and Medical Geography. Of cource, it's absolutely reasonable to make such a distinction in our article on health geography as well, explaining in the first section the implications made by using either of the two terms. But that doesn't mean we actually need two articles. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 20:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 13:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]