Talk:Hong Kong acid attacks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"South East Asia"[edit]

"(throwing objects from buildings is a problem in several areas of Southeast Asia)"

I find that this phrase to be irrelevant, since last time I checked, Hong Kong was situated in East Asia? Correct me if I'm wrong..?


--Platinum inc (talk) 19:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, personally I'm not adverse to include parts of southern china in the definition. Most (usually a bit oblique. I could swear it used to be covered on wp:, but I couldn't find it) references I remember are about Singapore. Circeus (talk) 20:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So are you saying that Hong Kong shouldn't be included in East Asia? Or perhaps it should be included in South East Asia? --Platinum inc (talk) 17:55, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's beside the point. You have a better idea for a formulation? Circeus (talk) 20:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But South East Asia and this acid attack have no links. If they were linked attacks, then this would definitely be relevant, but since they are not, I see no reason in including it. Furthermore, the bracketed phrase seems to be awkwardly thrown in, in a casual manner, not even matching the base sentence. I suggest removing the reference to South East Asia or starting a new sentence in regards to it.--Platinum inc (talk) 17:27, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is a direct connection as it serves as useful background information regarding an additional argument put forward regarding the installation of camera. This argument sounds silly unless you are aware of the frequency with which the thing occurs across the region. Circeus (talk) 18:49, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"A month after the attack, Yau Tsim Mong District Council voted to install four CCTV cameras in various areas with the specific aim of deterring litter-hurling in general (throwing objects from buildings is a problem in several areas of Southeast Asia) "
I find this to be misleading, Hong Kong is not in South East Asia. --Platinum inc (talk) 21:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not acid but alkali[edit]

The attacks involved drain cleaner (Sodium Hydroxide) which is not an acid but alkali. Therefore, it is more appropriate to rename as Mong Kok alkali atttack. --219.79.41.44 (talk) 02:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Without a source for the information, this is pointless. Are you sure yoU,re not confusing it with the Tsuen Wan incident, which did involve drain cleaner? Circeus (talk) 19:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage of latest attack[edit]

Hello. The last section is a bit of an anti-climax. Can we improve it please? Also, there is no mention of an episode in Causeway Bay, which is referenced in the BBC article. 220.100.104.166 (talk) 22:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Completed Photo Request[edit]

Added a photo of the acid attacks with a caption to improve the article. :) ∑∆∏ 00:34, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mong Kok Acid Attack.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Mong Kok Acid Attack.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hong Kong acid attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Hong Kong acid attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]