Talk:George Voskovec

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Jiří Voskovec)

12 Angry Men[edit]

I see the link to the movie has him playing the same part in 1954 as in 1957, is this right?

This was "his" role Pernambuco 23:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 March 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Consensus is that this continues to be the subject's common name. Cúchullain t/c 15:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Jiří VoskovecGeorge Voskovec – Far more well known as George Voskovec. Google Books gives 4570 results for "George Voskovec", and only 474 for Jiri. IMDb reveals he was only credited as Jiri 5 times in a career with 86+ credits. The amount of pages that link to the redirect "George Voskovec" is more than a handful, and the "George" redirect is actually viewed more than the Jiri page even though the article is at that title (1302 vs 751). Nohomersryan (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose from the article: "Although Voskovec lived in three countries and his maternal grandmother was French, he always maintained that "I am a born and bred Czech." ... and he was buried in Prague. In the 1960s when Hollywood was (even) more racist and xenophobic than today anglicized names were more common to allow for xenophobic and racist audiences - and Cold War awkwardness about Slav's. But if we look at sources post 2000 is this xenophobic feeling current in current WP:RS? does not look like it. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I know all about how racist Hollywood was/is/will continue to be. It's a sad fact for sure but it doesn't change that he achieved his greatest fame as George. Kal Penn isn't at Kalpen Modi for a reason. Also, I looked it up, and it does look like it. George is still commonly used to this day. [1] [2] [3] (I could add more, but I don't think it's necessary.) Nohomersryan (talk) 22:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not in books, books still have him at his real name. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just linked books? Nohomersryan (talk) 21:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. It's his common name by a large margin. While his change might've been a result of xenophobia, it does readers no favors to keep the article at an obscure name he rarely used. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The nominator has assembled a clear case that "George Voskovec" is how the subject is generally known in English sources. Speculation as to why he chose to use "George" in the US is irrelevant. —  AjaxSmack  02:38, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Voskovec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]