Talk:John Edgar (politician)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I am objecting to the copyright violation tag on this article. This was drawn from a 1928 book that has been placed on line with no copyright notice. The posting seems to be maintained by a local historical society that, like me, is interested in making its local history available. I believe I am helping them by putting their local history into Wikipedia, and referencing their site, so that anybody that uses Wikipedia to find this stuff will quickly get basic info and a reference to the local history site.

This does not seem to be good enough; Public_domain says 1923 is the cutof date for when you can be sure. It is no longer required that copyright notices are added when published for a work to retain its copyright, so that argument is not good enough either. Thue | talk 22:19, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I ought to mention that I'm a copyright lawyer. The 1923 date is sort of an absolute: the copyright would have had to have been renewed. Anyway, the source has pulled the referene off line, so maybe there is a problem. I've rewritten the article.M dorothy