Talk:Karasuk culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

Russia: History / Demographics & ethnography Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

Language[edit]

The language of the Karasuk culture is assumed to have been Yeniseian since many of the place names are clearly Yeniseian, particularly the names of rivers, throughout the area. This is the basis for giving the name Karasuk languages to a proposed language family for both the Burushaski and Yeniseian languages. There are obvious problems in terms of the time line for this. While the location is logical for this movement on the way to the lower Yenisei where recent Yeniseian languages are or were found, it could just as well be the original home of the Yeniseian people^{[citation needed]}. This would conflict with the belief that the ancestors of Yeniseian peoples were along the Lena river at the time the people who would become the Na-Dene in North America^{[citation needed]}.

Contradiction[edit]

The range of the c given in the intro does not correspontd to the reference given. Who writes such contradictions??2A02:8108:9640:AC3:2C33:BF38:5D58:F48 (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Style[edit]

Again and again: Thanks for adding the genetic informations, but please try to use a scientific style which requires to name Author and year! Everything else belongs into the references. Nobody is interested to read the whole journal infos in the running text.HJJHolm (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article[edit]

If it was located in modern-day Kazakhstan, why not mention the word "Kazakhstan" somewhere in the text of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 15:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]