This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
A user under the name of User:Rep kathy webb made some edits to the page this morning (diff), causing me to post a COI warning on that user's talk page. Subsequently, a COI tag has been added to the article. Having looked over the edits made by the potentially-conflicted user, I don't think there's much to worry about. The edits were in three parts:
changing "over 56 percent of the vote" to "57 percent of the vote"
Note: according to the ref, Webb won 56.50% of the vote. Having run the calculation myself, the exact number is 56.502572%, which does indeed round to 57%
editing the list of committee memberships
Note: the previous list included out-of-date information (she was vice chair of the JBC last session; this session she's co-chair) that this user corrected
adding additional awards
Note: I've not googled each award, but it would certainly be possible to verify each one. I personally think that the list of awards adds nothing to the article and would be in favor of removing entirely but, if it stays, it should certainly be up-to-date
In summary, I don't think that the potentially-conflicted edits are cause for concern. The COI tag states that a "major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject". Based on the limited edits made this morning, I don't think it's fair to call User:Rep kathy webb a "major contributor" to this article nor do I think there's any further cleanup needed to comply with Wikipedia policies. I therefore propose that the tag should be removed. Anyone disagree? --Lincolnite (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The editor who added the COI tag has indicated on my talk page that he's happy for it to be removed. I have therefore removed it. --Lincolnite (talk) 00:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
