Talk:Larch Hill

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scouting High‑importance

	Scouting portal Larch Hill is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessement[edit]

This article needs a reference and external links section as well more on what is going on there in regards to Scouting today. The history and layout sections are nice. These improvements are needed to get it to B-class. Rlevse 17:17, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting there, but: need at least one reference for B-class. Also, the section with one sentence should be expanded or merge, and expand the lead to summarize the whole article. leave msg on my talk page when done. Rlevse 12:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've become very active quickly, nice to see. For Larch hill, the intro should summarice the main topics in the article a tab more, but B-class now. Rlevse 15:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Larchlogo.png[edit]

Image:Larchlogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ireland Scouting.svg[edit]

The image Image:Ireland Scouting.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Courtney Clarke section[edit]

This section is composed of irrelevant and distracting family genealogical information which ought to be deleted almost in its entirety. The final paragraph of the section which begins, "Very little is known about the ownership from the 1870s..." ought to be retained. 97.122.250.215 (talk) 22:27, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How high is Larch Hill?[edit]

The elevation of this hill is required. It is a geographic feature prior to any scouting activity on the site. 174.16.18.77 (talk) 12:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Larch Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]