Talk:Leaving a Doll's House

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Essay tags[edit]

Just to confirm that this wasn't copied or pasted. I sat down this evening, went through the autobiography and wrote up the relevant points. I would be grateful if you could remove the box which indicates it was copied / pasted. Kind regards, Graham NorthLondoner (talk) 01:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will continue to work towards improving this article NorthLondoner (talk) 11:28, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote on the above editor's talk page in 2010, I don't think this meets Wikipedia's policies on notability, nor verifiability or original research. See the section on primary & secondary sources; this is all based on the primary source. I suggest that it would be better to merge some key points into the biography articles on Claire Bloom and Philip Roth, citing the book as the source. The page on the book can then be redirected to Claire Bloom. – Fayenatic London 20:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the tags after considerable improvement by User:Philip Cross. – Fayenatic London 11:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]