Talk:List of company towns in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ludlow, Colorado[edit]

I'm inquiring whether Ludlow, Colorado fits the criteria for this list. The entry says,

  • Ludlow, Colorado, was dominated by Colorado Fuel and Iron

My understanding is that Ludlow, Colorado, was not a company town, and not a mining camp. It was a key railroad junction near several mining camps which may have had company towns. It was the site of a massacre of union families during the 1913-14 strike, and was certainly dominated by CF&I. But in the strictest sense, i'm not sure it was a company town.

Ludlow currently has just a couple of ghost town buildings remaining. The 4th and 5th photos on this page are from my last visit to the ghost town remains, about five years ago:

http://www.rebelgraphics.org/ludlow_second_century.html

Richard Myers (talk) 21:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Empire, Nevada[edit]

I could be missing things, but it appears that Empire, NV is the only town in bold type on the list. This would imply that it is the only listed town that is still considered a company town - something I found doubtful, considering Lake Buena Vista et al. The list needs correction and would be more intuitive if current and former company towns were separated into sections. 64.206.63.50 (talk) 14:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Tiktok[reply]


http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20110611/ts_csm/388321 This article lists Empire as the last one, and that Empire is shutting down, so it seems that the page was correct, but that there aren't any anymore. CrystalDave (talk) 03:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of company towns in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bold entries, if any.[edit]

There are still company towns in the United States, or, at least, towns generally considered to be company towns here in the United States. Yet a cursory glance through the towns listed reveals none of them to be currently considered company towns. As such, unless someone decides to bold the entries considered company towns, I'm not sure if the lead of "Towns listed in bold are still considered company towns today; other entries are former company towns." is still applicable or useful. Javert2113 (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]