Talk:Local Journalism Sustainability Act

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

@Athaenara and Forbes72: User:Athaenara can you please explain why you reverted the 2022-05-22T10:02:44‎ addition by User:Forbes72 1:24:39 h:mm:ss later?

It seems to me it's entirely relevant, especially since it has been reintroduced in the new session of Congress in both the House and the Senate. Accordlingly, I've revised that "Discussion" section of the article, so the previous sentence and those additions flow more smoothly. I hope this meets with you approval. DavidMCEddy (talk) 13:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David, it looks like I wasn't reverted. Athaenara's edit reverted the edit by User:Mikeblinder, while leaving my additions intact. I agree with the revert, because this this looks like WP:COI editing. Editor & Publisher looks reasonable enough as a source for WP:RSOPINION regarding newspaper publishing, but https://dankennedy.net/ is not a good source, since it is a self-published blog. 〈 Forbes₇₂ | Talk 〉 16:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]