Talk:Longue Pointe

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada: Quebec / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Hudson Bay not visible

Longue Pointe is about 85 km south from Hudson Bay, so it is impossible to see it from ground level. Or you would need to be 555 m (1820 ft) high, see: Horizon. -- P199 (talk) 17:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move page

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move.

I'm requesting that we rename the page to Longue Pointe (Quebec), since we should be using the English variant (ie - unaccented) of the provincial name on the English Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board/Style guide for details. Mind matrix 20:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support as nominator. Mind matrix 20:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as per WP:CSG. Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment, shouldn't it be Longue Pointe, Quebec? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Longue Pointe refers to the geographical feature (peninsula) and not a community or settlement (there isn't any). So according to WP:CSG, it should be Longue Pointe or Longue Pointe (Quebec). -- P199 (talk) 16:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Therefore, Support per nominator. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although I'm not sure that a straight spelling change like this actually requires discussion. Bearcat (talk) 21:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Longue Pointe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010010826/http://www2.ebtech.net/~birdman/jbias06.html to http://www2.ebtech.net/~birdman/jbias06.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]