Talk:2008–09 Manchester United F.C. season

Football: England / Manchester United / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Manchester United task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Transfers

PJ! You are yet to provide a convincing argument for why the May 2008 transfers should be left off this page. I ask you to consider this: this page is used for encyclopaedic reference. If in say..5 years, you wanted to know the arrivals and departures from the squad for the new season (2008-09), you would look on this page, not the 2007-08 page. There is certainly no harm in having the information on both pages in any case. ForeverDevil (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008 is not part of the 2008-09 season. Officially, the football season in England runs from 1 July to 31 May the following year, with the month of June being regarded as an off-season period. For the purposes of Wikipedia, though, the off-season period is tagged onto the end of the previous season. Therefore, any events that happen prior to 1 July 2008 go into the 2007-08 season article, while events from 1 July 2008 onwards go into the 2008-09 season article. This has been agreed upon in several conversations between other members of the community. – Pee Jay 21:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its signings for the 2008-09 season though so they should be on this page and 2007-08 seasom as they were made during the 2007-08 season however they were signed to play in the 2008-09 seasonROOSTER (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a link to said discussion? It might save some effort. ForeverDevil (talk) 23:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

? ForeverDevil (talk) 17:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, we can go through such a discussion again at WP:FOOTY. That OK? – Pee Jay 17:12, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Is this the place to do so? Thanks. ForeverDevil (talk) 22:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would say Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football would get more coverage. Few people actually visit the sub-pages any more. Shame really. Anyway, I'll start the discussion and link back here after. – Pee Jay 22:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion has begun at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Lists of transfers in clubs' season articles. Obviously, I welcome all contributions. – Pee Jay 22:51, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there..

A citation needed for "Should Manchester United win the Premier League 2008-09 title, they will join Liverpool as the most successful club in terms of English top-flight titles with 18"?

Its true, and can be seen on Man Utd and Liverpool that Man Utd have 17 titles to Liverpools 18. 77.99.186.110 (talk) 17:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please link to the appropriate page or pages. The claim could be refuted by someone who thinks the number of titles is not what it actually is. Please use a good third-party resource. BBC, ESPN, Sports Illustrated, The Guardian or any other Newspaper will do. Calebrw (talk) 17:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks PeeJay2K3. Calebrw (talk) 19:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why isnt the page like any of the other premier league teams current season pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.247.42.252 (talk • contribs)

Does it have to be? Several people have agreed that the style used on this page is much better than the style used on other teams' current season pages, as the others include a lot of unnecessary information, and I can assure you, this one will not be conforming to that style. – Pee Jay 07:23, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FA Community Shield

On the results table where they play Portsmouth, shouldn't the line be green not yellow? They won the game didn't they? Just thought thats what it should be. Birdy (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It goes by regulation result. The reg result was a draw. The penalty was a win. Calebrw (talk) 18:03, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should Cardiff City and Swansea City use Wales flag?

Cardiff City and Swansea City are located in Wales, but they participate England Football League. I don't think they should use Wales flag as it will mislead both teams participate Welsh League. Just like use France flag for AS Monaco. I think they should use England flag instead of Wales flag.--Yick50907551 (talk) 12:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a tricky issue, sure. However, as has been discussed many times over at WT:FOOTY, Cardiff, Swansea and all of the other Welsh clubs who play in the English league should use the Welsh flag as they do not hold any sort of membership with the Football Association, and are full members of the Football Association of Wales. Therefore, they are Welsh clubs playing as guests in the English league. – Pee Jay 13:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Debut spelling

Debut is spelled both debut and début in the Premier League section. The latter is in the first paragraph, while the former is in the last paragraph. I don't know which is correct for British English, so I'll let someone else decide. Calebrw (talk) 12:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seed or Seeds

As winners ... qualified for the group stage of the 2008–09 UEFA Champions League as top seeds.

Should this be seed or seeds? I think it should be seed, but this could be another example of British English. Calebrw (talk) 04:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carling Cup

I don't know if Carling Cup fixtures are copyrighted like the Premier Leagues are, but if not, then shouldn't the semi-finals legs with Derby County be added? Calebrw (talk) 17:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All fixtures in competitions organised and run by the Premier League or the Football League are copyrighted by Football DataCo. Therefore, just as the Premier League fixtures are copyrighted, so too are Football League Cup fixtures. – Pee Jay 17:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Figured it was something like that. Calebrw (talk) 23:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too early for Manchester United F.C. season 2009–10?

PJ, do you think it's too early for Manchester United F.C. season 2009–10? United just announced their Asia tour dates today, so some things could be filled in. Your call though. When should this article be created? Thanks, Calebrw (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, I was thinking the exact same thing earlier today, and I decided against it. It is only January, after all. However, we now have confirmed fixtures for the 2009–10 season, so it's a bit up in the air. I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be created, but perhaps it should be done in someone's userspace first. – Pee Jay 16:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done User:Calebrw/Manchester United F.C. season 2009–10. We can start here. I'll add the preseason fixtures in Asia. Calebrw (talk) 04:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect opening section (RE: European competition)

"The team will also be aiming to become the first in over 19 years to win consecutive UEFA Champions League titles, Milan being the last team to achieve this in 1990."

No side has ever won consecutive Champions League titles which is why Man Utd winning it would be such an achievement. Milan and numerous other clubs have won consecutive European Cup titles. The key difference, aside from name, being the format. Teso Dos Bichos (talk) 23:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right you are. The lead should actually say "The team will also be aiming to become the first in over 19 years to win consecutive European Cup titles, Milan being the last team to achieve this in 1990." – Pee Jay 23:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PeeJay, I don't know if "the team were aiming" is grammatically correct, so I'm changing it to "the team aimed..." which would work whether it is singular or plural --Minding 11:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redo?

Why is there a "Redo from here ... to here" thing on the parts with reports? Just wondering...
Ը२ձւե๓ձռ¹⁷ 16:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a personal thing. I'm not happy with the tone of some of the sections, and the writing style could do with some improvement. – Pee Jay 16:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right. Fair enough. If you ever need any help with it, I'm up for rewording things.
Ը२ձւե๓ձռ¹⁷ 09:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wes Brown

The page list Wes Brown as having won a EPL winner medal for 2008-2009 season. However, he played only a total of 8 games (2 of which he came in as a reserve). He was not among the players who went up to receive a medal in Man Utd's second last match of the season. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DragTian (talk • contribs) 06:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where you're getting that idea, but there is no list of the club's PL winners' medal recipients in this article. – Pee Jay 09:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I put it at wrong place. This should be the correct place -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_football_players_with_a_Premier_League_winner%27s_medal —Preceding unsigned comment added by DragTian (talk • contribs) 13:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Match reports

I recommend that all the existing match reports on this page, ie those published by Manchester United, be replaced as the links have all expired. I will most likely do it myself later, but if someone else wants to do it then ta. Imlikeaboss (talk) 22:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]