Talk:McMillan TAC-50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Collapsable?[edit]

I have heard that the TAC-50 can be collapsed/dismantled/field stripped for easy transport and reassembled (relatively) quickly at the sniper's destination. I, however, cannot confirm this (admittedly, my source was rather dubious). Is this true, and if so does it warrant a mention in the article? 169.233.49.73 (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The only parts of the gun that can be removed for "ease of transport" are the suppressor (assuming one is fitted) and the buttstock, both of which can be screwed/unscrewed off and on. I don't know why someone has written that this rifle has a side-folding stock, because it does not. 216.36.154.122 (talk) 03:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian[edit]

Didnt a canadian sniper make a kill with this from 2400 meters? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.37.50 (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2007

Yep. Longest recorded kill-shot ever I think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.123.62.68 (talk) 02:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
At the stated muzzle velocity of 823 m/s, the bullet took a full 3 seconds to reach the target at 2430 meters. That's a long hang time for such a precision shot.--ZirbMonkey (talk) 19:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is definatly impressive, and the gun, in my opinion is a extremely attractive gun, more so than the barret 50. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.65.46.122 (talk) 15:17, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cpl. Robert Furlong - Canadian Forces, holds record for longest kill shot recorded at 1.5 miles (2414 meters). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.17.129.178 (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New record 3,450 meters, set by member of Canadian Special Forces Joint Task Force 2 - https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canadian-elite-special-forces-sniper-sets-record-breaking-kill-shot-in-iraq/article35415651/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.171.134.162 (talk) 02:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updated 'Deployment'[edit]

I updated the 'deployment' section with the details on the latest recorded 'longest sniper kill' which should have been updated back in 2009.Twobells (talk) 21:38, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for the editing help Rog5728, I should have used the term 'chambered', thanks very much! Ps; I like the FN too but in 7.62 :-) Twobells (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. ROG5728 (talk) 22:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

can i use it?[edit]

will they sell this to me? or is it military use only?69.171.164.55 (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bad ref link (i think)[edit]

Your link for Reference 2 is bad I think, can you confirm?? I'll check this pc for a redirector too, but it seems consistent and isolated... .[1] Ljettinger (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Data Summary McMillan Tactical Tac-50

Tac 338[edit]

Is it the same weapon with a different chamber and barrel to accommodate the .338 round, or should there be a new article? BP OMowe (talk) 23:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on McMillan Tac-50. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TAC not Tac[edit]

I believe the correct spelling is with capitals "TAC" and not "Tac". IQ125 (talk) 11:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on McMillan TAC-50. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:McMillan_TAC-50&oldid=1203947221"