Talk:Mesozoa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Enigmatic???[edit]

How can the general encyclopedic definition of an animal characterise it under the vague definition of "enigmatic"??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.83.95.88 (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monoblastozoa[edit]

What are the Monoblastozoa?--Crustaceanguy 00:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Monoblastozoans appear to be simple animals with only a single layer of cells. But because they are based only on a single description, many workers doubt they are a real group. See the reference added to the article.
Cephal-odd 03:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove life cycle?[edit]

If Orthonectida and Rhombozoan are not closely related, how about removing the discussion of life cycles to the articles about those constituent phyla? Most of the details are specific to one group or the other anyway. Cephal-odd 04:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Monophyletic?[edit]

Why does the article say they used to be classed as a phylum (a ranked clade) but were recently discovered to be monophyletic, and are no longer treated as a clade? This is self-contradictory. Please clarify whether "Mesozoa" are polyphyletic or paraphyletic, as related to Rouphozoa. 2601:441:467F:9E00:D4E:A480:AA82:C438 (talk) 02:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mesozoan is not the singular of Mesozoa[edit]

Mesozoan is not the singular of Mesozoa. I will remove it. --kupirijo (talk) 17:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]