Talk:Muk (food)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New cat[edit]

What is the "Korean culture of Japanese origin" category doing here? Badagnani (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the user who created the category and inserted to here is infinitely blocked for his abhsjve sockpuppetry. Azukimonaka (talk · contribs). They(?) might be very familiar to you. --Appletrees (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Norangmuk[edit]

Text about norangmuk:


Badagnani (talk) 17:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want to ask? /addition: I saw you keep calling my removal of your hidden comment as "blanking". Your edit of inserting hidden comment is not a real contribution to the article. Please use this page whenever you have a doubt and question.
I don't know how to translate "치자", but it is a flower with yellow color. The muk has very vivid color unlike nokdumuk.--Appletrees (talk) 18:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is gardenia. It now appears that norangmuk and hwangpomuk have the same ingredients and description. They are likely the same thing, as the taepyeongso and hojok are. Badagnani (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Muk (food). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muk (food). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Muk_(food)&oldid=1204114547"