Talk:E-learning (theory)

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Mid‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 11 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Henry Hollander.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Upon encountering this article, it was evident that both the definition in the article lede and the content of the article were speaking to the topic name of the article from a particular and very specific perspective, namely the cognitive THEORY of said topic. There was pertinent material to that specific perspective in Learning platform that has been looking for a "good home" (that article is being worked toward a merge with VLE). I believe this article is strengthened by this material, BUT a lot of work is needed to tidy up what was here, as well as to clean up what is being brought over. A decision will need to be made subsequently whether this article should be entitled in a way that reflects what it addresses, or whether it is actually yet another fork of VLE (or, alternatively, VLE a fork of this article.) FeatherPluma (talk) 02:54, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganized the page somewhat... someone added a general section at the top of the page. This page was about a specialized form of learning... not just learning--Dlewis3 (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the "Principles" section of this article needs some updating. I've added an introductory paragraph for this section, and plan to add a little more detail on specific multimedia instructional design principles that are well supported by the literature.WikiWikiRoy (talk) 22:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just added a follow up paragraph expanding on the link between cognitive load theory and the multimedia instructional design principles. Also added short list of example principles.WikiWikiRoy (talk) 22:02, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Started reorganizing the part of this section that described different principles into a list format and added descriptive detail. Currently, this list contains 5 principles. I plan to add 6 more in the near future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiWikiRoy (talk • contribs) 03:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Added Learner control principle and made edits to Segmenting principle.WikiWikiRoy (talk) 23:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Added Personalization principle.WikiWikiRoy (talk) 03:22, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Added Pre-training principle.WikiWikiRoy (talk) 02:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Added Redundancy principle. WikiWikiRoy (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Added Signalling principle. WikiWikiRoy (talk) 19:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Added Expertise effect. 23.242.195.201 (talk) 17:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

This article is about multimedia learning theory, not multimedia learning, which is covered in e-learning. I intend to rename, but solicit comments. FeatherPluma (talk) 18:43, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed. Appropriate redirects added /checked. FeatherPluma (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tjmccue/2018/07/31/e-learning-climbing-to-325-billion-by-2025-uf-canvas-absorb-schoology-moodle/#40bb0d463b39. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 19:49, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tone and style

The article seems overly academic in its style and tone. I'm not entirely sure if the tag I added describes the issue best, but my point is that the article needs to be reworked (IMO) to be reading less like an essay or literature review. Abraxxass12 (talk) 14:57, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Provenance of parts of theories

It would be useful to include historical data around content such as Mayer's CTML theory and when the Pre-training Principle was incorporated. jhengstler(talk) 23:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Illustrative aid" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Illustrative aid has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 24 § Illustrative aid until a consensus is reached. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 15:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]