Muslim Scout Association of Lebanon is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
I have again trimmed off the caption on the image, that is for the article space itself, and inappropriate on the image itself. Chris 02:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ghazello-You need to stop reverting text that is relevant or changes I made, without explaining yourself on the talk page or in the edit summaries. Wikipedia's rule is If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it. You take Muhammad out of Muhammad Toufik El Hibri's name, breaking the hyperlink. For all I know, it could be two separate people, father and son or grandson, but you don't say, you just revert. When I change one of your edits, the photo caption for instance, from "primary supporter of the Scout movement in Lebanon and the Arab world", something unsourced, possibly true for Lebanon but inapplicable for Egypt or Morocco, to "recipient of the Bronze Wolf award", something documented, you revert back to the text you've put in. I removed the caption from you photograph, and explained in the edit that captions belong on the article, not as part of the photograph. In response you created two more copies of the photo, with the captions added again. I have no doubt you have better sources than I do, you're probably right in many of your additions, maybe even in your reverts, but you need to explain yourself when you make those changes. I think you don't understand the process well enough to allow other users to make good changes on the article. I support your enthusiasm, but you have to let others edit, too. Chris 02:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
