Talk:Naranjal District
(Redirected from Talk:Naranjal District, Paraguay)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Naranjal District Mike Cline (talk) 18:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Naranjal District, Paraguay → Naranjal District –
I found no other by that name. relisted--Mike Cline (talk) 12:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC) Felipe Montero (talk) 16:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- NOTE: I have reverted a non-admin closure and move of this page. Please don't do that! Wait for an admin. There are provisions for non-admin closures in special cases; this was not such a case. And anyway, 2.5 days is not enough time for editors to come in and make their comments. NoeticaTea? 06:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. See other entries at the DAB page Naranjal. Especially considering the uncertainty of translated names for geopolitical entities like districts, departments, counties, cantons, and so on, it is not helpful to readers to omit a qualifier. Retaining "Paraguay" is the present case immediately helps readers find what they are looking for. NoeticaTea? 07:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- There is no other Naranjal District on that page. It is never translated as department or canton. You are doing overdisambiguation. Felipe Montero (talk) 14:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support per WP:PRECISION. This is unnecessary disambiguation of an already disambiguated title. Rennell435 (talk) 03:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support per WP:PRECISION. There is nothing this will be confused with. Also, the NAC was perfectly fine – this is done all the time because we aren't a bureaucracy. Jenks24 (talk) 10:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support per nom and other comments. I don't think there's any chance of confusion here. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.