Talk:Neural clique

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Neurology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poor article, Absurd Links[edit]

This article is pretty poor overall, but the "see also" section is especially bad. "Brain" would be a better choice than "consciousness", and the next two links are to junk science. I am changing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lithoppsosite (talk • contribs) 23:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Lithoppsosite, I saw the article only after your changes and it had still to be reworked. I reworked it to add more sources and place them inline, I now removed the banner, the article should be okay-ish in this state (this is still in research, there is much to be discovered, but there is enough evidence to make it a noteworthy concept IMHO). --Lrq3000 (talk) 14:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

incomplete sentence[edit]

Could someone who understands this topic fix this not-sentence: "However, the mesoscopic level microscopic level with the NMDA coding of coordinated activity in synapses."? UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 11:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the 'History' section, just past half-way down. Looks like inadvertent combination of the preceding and following sentences. Perhaps just remove that not-sentence, as that wouldn't seem to change the information presented? UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Signimu (talk) 01:22, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]