Talk:Nightmute, Alaska

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alaska Low‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled[edit]

The WikiProject U.S. Cities standards might help.

City?[edit]

Why is this place being described as a city with only 208 people? If it has received a city charter with this few people, I think that should be noted as that would be unusual. 23skidoo 03:11, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not at all unusual. Alaska (like many states) doesn't distinguish between "cities", "towns", "villages", "townships", or anything else. All incorporated settlements are "cities". —Zero Gravitas 05:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion: there's no lower limit on incorporation. Kupreanof is, as far as I know, the smallest incorporated city in the state, with a population of 23. And there are similarly small places elsewhere—Ismay, Montana for instance. 208 isn't even interestingly small compared to that. —Zero Gravitas 05:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And since you mentioned it in your original comment, which is being steadily buried under my replies, I've added a note to that effect on the Kupreanof article, with my source. Thanks for getting me thinking about the subject... even if months after you forgot even making the comment! —Zero Gravitas 05:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm dying to know the origin of the name.--68.9.134.146 00:50, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nightmute, Alaska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]