Talk:Nokere Koerse

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nokere–Koerse → Nokere Koerse —

This is not a race from Nokere TO Koerse as the dash in the name invokes, but the "Nokere Race" ("de koerse" is (dialect) Flemish for "the race"). The name is different from the very common FROM-TO cycling race names, and I presume it appeared (only in the English wiki btw) by someone who wasn't aware of it and assumed this was like Paris-Nice, Tirreno-Adriatico, etc. But it's like the "Tour de France", the "Nokere Race", so no dashes. http://www.nokerekoerse.be/ MinksterWiki (talk) 23:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Probably a mistake in English because of how the UCI write it (i.e. as Nokere-Koerse, and possibly the UCI don't know what is correct either). Severo^TC 00:14, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The form with the dash may be correct usage in Flemish. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.