Talk:North American O-47

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on North American O-47. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Lost" version[edit]

Why no mention of the version flown/shown in the 1964 movie "The Flight of the Phoenix" ? ? ?

Especially since the aircraft is specifically mentioned in the 'Flight' article/entry.

Just curious. 2600:8800:C89:EA00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 22:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because no one has cited a reliable published source for it. It's unsourced in the movie article either, and should probably be removed until reliable sources are found. BilCat (talk) 22:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would some info about capabilities be welcome also in infobox?[edit]

Could some of capabilities also be stated in infobox (e.g. max and cruise speed, range...), not just far down in the body of the article? I am not at home with airplane articles to know if it's common to have them there. Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]