Talk:Novint Technologies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A picture of the Falcon would be nice. --71.243.55.75 (talk) 19:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The Falcon is hard to picture.--Auric (talk) 13:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a picture of my Falcons, and it includes the currently available grips. If you'd like me to add any other angles, say so, and I'll see what I can do! Lapsus Antepedis (talk) 08:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I edited information about Wikipedia's discussion about Novint. I read through Wikipedia's discussion of Conflict of Interest, and although I admit there could be a level of appearance of conflict of interest simply in the fact that I edited the Novint article, really, I have unique information about Novint and its history. I wrote the information about Novint as factually as I could, telling information that I believe someone searching for Novint would want to read and learn about. I highly regard Wikipedia and what it is trying to accomplish (and of course, has accomplished), and I laid out a format for the Novint article that I believe needed to be added so that other users can continue to grow and expand the article. I did not write it in a way that I felt was self-promoting, but rather in a way that told the facts and history of Novint factually.

thx, Tom (tomnovint)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tomnovint" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomnovint (talkcontribs) 05:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...[edit]

I found this to be a very interesting and informative article for several reasons beyond the amazing technological aspects of the Falcon. And all this, after reading about the rumble pak. First, I found it to be somewhat POV towards the Novint corporation, as Tom Anderson suggested here 3 years ago. My second thought was, what exactly is the corporate/government connection here? After informing myself on Sandia National Laboratories and it's history with DARPA and nuclear research, and it's more recent history with physics-based software development, my third thought was, is this an open-source project like the others?... or how is it licensed?

I'm sure you're wondering what my fourth thought was... Who, exactly, is Tom Anderson, and who does he work for? Mr. Anderson, have you been profiting off turning us all into ultimate killing machines? 66.41.148.107 (talk) 11:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]