Talk:Pétrus (restaurant)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 16:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

General

No issues with the reliability of sources
No issues with imaging
One dab link
No dead links

Lead

"It is now in it's third location" → "It is now in its third location"
You could accommodate the origin of its name in the lead.

Reception

"The restaurant won it's first Michelin star" → "The restaurant won its first Michelin star"
"She found issues with some of the dishes, such as a mackerel which wasn't properly filleted, and some overcooked samphire." needs ref
'The' in 'The Evening Standard' is redundant, and should be italicised – Lemonade51 (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On hold, no issues with imaging and sourcing. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the fixes as appropriate, thanks for the review. Miyagawa (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Blofeld[edit]

The lead needs expansion with some info about what sort of cuisine it specializes in and the reception summary. Although it isn't appropriate to reel off a menu as such, I would like to see a bit more coverage of its cuisine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll draw together a couple of paragraphs today based on the description of the menu in the more recent reviews. Miyagawa (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a couple of paragraphs about the menu. Miyagawa (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]