Talk:Peer-to-peer web hosting

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet Mid‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numbers of users[edit]

Would anyone consider numbers of users as an interesting information to include in the table for p2p web hosting? Spekulatius2410 (talk) 04:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's almost impossible, these projects are beta (lots of testers come and quit) and the P2P technology makes (very) harder to count the users. Dadu (talk) 09:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough. Makes sense. Spekulatius2410 (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia should use this technology[edit]

Wikipedia wants donations to pay for web hosting. Seeing as there are so many wikipedia users, would it not be better to abandon the client/server model altogether in favour of an entirely decentralised model? How many users who are not willing to donate would be willing to donate a small amount of computer/bandwidth resources? Client/server architecture is last century's news. 60.241.100.51 (talk) 22:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer-to-peer web hosting technology is experimental, and has drawbacks too (bandwidth, storage space). Dadu (talk) 09:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]