Talk:Petr Cibulka

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Czech Republic Low‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cibulka lists[edit]

IMHO this deserves topic of its own, something ala Lists of collaborators with secret police in Czechoslovakia. This would include Cibulka's list, the official one, disputes around, events like Bartoncik etc. There's potential for quite large article. Pavel Vozenilek 18:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not writing it. It could be a large article and if my name will be on it, the aparatchik-squad from Czech Wikipedia will certainly delete it almost immediatelly. I generally think that it does not make any sense to put any efforts into it until some action against the Czech Wiki-terrorists will be taken. Recent example: My inclusion of info about "anti-Cibulka law" from this article was removed by some Czech vandal and nothing happened.

Go ahead and write it - I will do minor contribs. Ross.Hedvicek 21:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Online journal and self-published sources[edit]

The name of Cibulka's online journal was referred to in the source in lower case letter format. Although self-published sources refer to the title of the journal in all capital letters, we should follow the format used by neutral third-party sources.

There is an issue of self-published sources being cited throughout the article. I've added new citations to third-party sources. Also, “see website of party” is not a valid way to cite sources, additionally this would be considered a self-published source, and has been removed. Detente 1 (talk) 16:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Online magazine Revue.idnes.cz[edit]

-jkb-, Do you have an English version for Revue.idnes.cz? English-language sources are preferred over non-English if available (see WP:NONENG). Detente 1 (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]