Talk:Physicist and Christian

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Physics: Publications Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Publications Taskforce.

Note[edit]

Note italics added to Harold K. Schilling quote are part of the actual William G. Pollard text. They don't show up the electronic version unfortuneatley. --Firefly322 (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Firefly asked me to take a look at this article. I have a few thoughts, mostly along the lines of layout and style, really.

I don't care for the look of the reviews section. The tiny quote text is hard to read.
Use the text of the reviews to comment on the book more. a section on 'public reception' or something would be of use here.
if possible use the text itself less as a reference. Use of the text has a higher potential to lead to issues with original research, which we should avoid. I don't notice that original research is an issue now, but it can become one with out careful attention to details.

Keep at it! --Rocksanddirt (talk) 21:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]