Talk:Pitohui

Birds Mid‑importance

Pitohui is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Pronunciation[edit]

Some sources online say it is pronounced "like spitting: pittoeey". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.107.156.200 (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

It seems reasonable to merge the genus and a page describing the common use of the term as the same subject is being described. Klbrain (talk) 06:53, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, common name refers to several unrelated species. Sabine's Sunbird talk 06:56, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: It makes no sense to merge a single genus into this article, given that four genera in three different families are involved! MeegsC (talk) 16:42, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious oppose - not sure of how this came about - the page clearly says it is a name used for several genera. I have tried to make the lead clearer. Shyamal (talk) 06:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The unrelated species used to be part of the genus. Which means the article for the genus needs to include information about the unrelated species, to inform people who are looking for information on the old definition. Which means both articles are virtually identical, so it's silly not to merge them. - 68.207.248.247 (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]