Talk:Plainwell, Michigan

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Michigan may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Removed section[edit]

I removed the section titled Abuse By Local Officials : diff:[1]

The section contained 3 statements - 1 was unsourced speculation, 1 was unsourced, and the other had a link to a website that appears to be a "news blog". (The "blog" may be more reliable than I'm giving it credit for - I'm unfamiliar with it.) That, however, was incidental to the main reason I removed it. I felt that, before the article, which is basically one of a set of short geographical/facts and figure type articles, had a section like this - which could be perceived as POV or soapboxing, it might be a good idea to get consensus on this discussion page.

- Begoon (talk) 11:58, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]